World

Will China Invade North Korea and Take Its Nuclear Facilities?

Oriana Skylar Mastro,Newsweek 9 hours ago

https://www.yahoo.com/news/china-invade-north-korea-nuclear-161803948.html

This article first appeared on the American Enterprise Institute site.
On the surface, China’s North Korea policy seems relatively consistent. China is keen to demonstrate that it is cooperating with international efforts to rein in North Korea, including allowing the passage of various U.N. Security Council sanctions on the regime.
But China has also been unwilling to push the Kim regime as much as the United States wants, primarily for fear of provoking reckless behavior on the part of Kim Jong Un, as well as the loss of any influence China has left.
Trending: Relationship Goals: Couples Like the Same Foods Even When They Don’t Like Each Other
In a picture released September 13, 2016, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un inspects Farm No. 1116 under Korean People's Army Unit 810 at an undisclosed location in North Korea. KCNA/AFP/Getty
However, if one looks a bit deeper, China’s North Korea strategy is evolving in subtle and significant ways.

1. China is no longer wedded to the preservation of the Kim regime.

Over the past three years, Chinese President Xi Jinping has been surprisingly vocal in support of Korean reunification in the long term—though through a gradual, incremental peace—even if it entails the demise of North Korea as a sovereign state. Polls suggest that Chinese public opinion generally supports moving away from North Korea.
Don't miss: Fox News's Sean Hannity Gathers Panel of White People to Discuss Racism

2. Chinese interests in a Korea contingency have expanded beyond concerns about a refugee spillover to include nuclear security.

Chinese military capabilities have improved greatly over the past 10 years, and the missions the People's Liberation Army (PLA) may be involved in have expanded in tandem. Training, equipment, exercises and aspects of the reorganization suggest contingency plans are likely in place for a mission to secure North Korean nuclear weapons and fissile material.
Chinese leaders may intervene to seize North Korean nuclear facilities to prevent North Korean use or the U.S., Japan or South Korea from striking them, which could result in cross-border contamination.

3. China is unlikely to fight to protect the Kim regime, and its defense and political officials do not expect to be invited to intervene.

Most recognize that Chinese forces may even be opposed by North Korean forces but will at least have an advantage because Kim will orient his forces south to deal with U.S. and South Korean forces.
Most popular: Dangerous Foods: The Unexpected Poison Lurking Inside Apricots

4. The PLA may move into North Korean territory to ensure a degree of control over the conflict and its outcome.

China will need to be involved in any contingency on the peninsula to ensure that Korea reunifies on terms favorable to Beijing. The last thing China wants is North Korean instability or an outcome that strengthens the U.S. role in the region.
However, Beijing is more likely to pressure Pyongyang and risk instability if it believes it stands to benefit regardless of how North Korea responds.

5. Explicit planning for contingencies on the Korean peninsula is still too sensitive for China.

However, the United States and China could begin coordination efforts indirectly, such as through civilian training or technical exchanges on nuclear issues, or through supporting China’s expanded involvement in international nuclear security exercises. U.S. experts and officials could also push to observe China’s national level nuclear emergency joint exercises, such as the Shendun series.
To learn more, please see the full brief here.
Oriana Skylar Mastro is a Jeane Kirkpatrick visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, where she focuses on Chinese military and security policy in the Asia Pacific and is writing a book on China’s approach to global leadership. She is also assistant professor of security studies at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University and serves in the United States Air Force Reserve as a political-military affairs strategist at Pacific Air Forces.

COMMENT:

A SIMPLE QUESTION WHY NOT ASK US IF IT WOULD ATTACK ISRAEL AND TAKE OVER ALL WMD FROM ISRAEL

ALL THINGS THAT ARE HAPPENING BECAUSE OF MISSILE FIRING  IN NORTH KOREA IS BECAUSE OF THIS UNCOUTH ZIONIST STATE. ISRAEL

YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT ISRAEL IS TO US, NORTH KOREA IS TO CHINA..

 THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF PAID ANALYSTS IN US GOVERNMENT ORG. WHY SHOULD NOT THEY DO THE RESEARCH WORK AND TELL THE AUTHORITIES WHY NORTH KOREA IS SO ADAMANT TO EVEN THREATENED US. WHETHER IT HAS A COVERT BACK UP SUPPORT OF ANY SUPER POWER OR NOT

EATING MONEY DOING NOTHING TANTAMOUNT TO NOT INTENTIONALLY HELPING  THE GOVERNMENT IS A CRIME.

TIME HAS COME WHEN ISRAEL HAS TO SURRENDER ALL ITS NUKES OR PUT US IN JEOPARDY AND TO THINK AFRESH IF IT WOULD HAVE TO KEEP FRIENDLY RELATIONSHIP TIES WITH ISRAEL OR NOT, LEAST TO SPEAK TO TAKE THE TERRORIST  STATE OF ISRAEL AS A TRUSTED  ALLY . 

TIME WOULD BE RUNNING OUT VERY SOON. TO STOP NORTH KOREA DIPLOMATICALLY. THIS MIGHT BE A GOOD BARGAINING POINT.

THINK AND TAKE A DECISION AFTER A DETAIL DELIBERATION ON BOTH THE MERITS AND DEMERITS OF THE ISSUE BEFORE THE MATTER ESCALATES AND RUNS OUT  CONTROL.