BDS: A Legitimate and Moral Response to Israeli Policy

Posted: 06/13/2015 8:58 am EDT Updated: 06/13/2015 9:59 am ED

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-zogby/bds-a-legitimate-and-mora_b_7575794.html

The Israeli government response to the "Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions" (BDS) movement has been predictable. Being incapable of engaging in any reasonable form of self-criticism or even self-reflection, Israeli leaders have, instead, turned their wrath on their accusers and their victims.

In recent years, several entities have implemented boycotts or are in the process of considering other punitive actions in an effort to force a change in Israeli behavior in the occupied territories. European governments are moving to require Israel to label products originating in West Bank settlements so as to distinguish them from exports from Israel. Some U.S. churches and pension funds have decided to divest from businesses that support the occupation and settlement enterprises. U.S. and U.K. student groups have been successful in winning votes calling on their institutions to support BDS. And some professional academic groups and renowned scholars and performers have indicated that they will not cooperate with events supporting or hosted by Israeli institutions in the occupied lands.

These actions are not only legitimate expressions of political concern, they are also a profoundly moral response to Israel's behavior. When confronted by: Israel's continued defiance of international law; its theft of Palestinian lands in order to construct Jewish-only settlements and roads; and its daily displays of brutality and humiliation of captive Palestinians -- the desire to disassociate from and refuse to support that behavior is the right thing to do. And when confronted by an international system that has neutered itself, refusing to act decisively to put the brakes on Israeli conduct in the occupied territories, then the response of the BDS movement becomes even more supportable.

In the face of this growing international pressure campaign, the Netanyahu government has gone on the offensive. Speaking this week in Israel, the Prime Minister said:
We are in the midst of a great struggle being waged against the state of Israel, an international campaign to blacken its name... The last thing we should do is bow our heads and ask where we erred, where we went wrong. We did not err, we did not do wrong.

Netanyahu went on to emphasize that what is behind this international campaign is nothing more than anti-Semitism in a new form. Others in his government went further calling the BDS movement "terrorism" or equating it to Nazi efforts to demonize and eliminate the Jewish people.

As an initial response, Israel's legal system has criminalized activities that support BDS. And Israel's allies in Congress have followed suit by introducing language in both the pending trade and U.S. Customs authorization bills that would target countries or businesses that in any way boycott, sanction or divest funds from Israel.
There is, of course, more than a little chutzpah on display here. Israel acts with impunity in seizing Palestinian land, demolishing Palestinian homes and denying basic freedoms to Palestinians. Israel then acts to sanction the Palestinian Authority by refusing to transfer tax revenues that are legally Palestinian funds, and supports U.S. legislation that sanctions and divests from any United Nations entity that recognizes Palestinian national rights. But when confronted with a dose of the same medicine, Netanyahu not only screams "foul," he denounces his adversaries as "anti-Semites" and threatens severe retaliation.

This is nothing more than the perverse reaction of a spoiled child who insists that he not only win every game, but that he must be able to define the rules by which the game is played. And when everybody doesn't agree to his "rules," a name-calling tantrum follows, coupled with threats of retaliation. This is the spoiled child turned bully.
It's an old story. When the United Nations votes 143 to three in favor of a Palestinian position, Israel denounces the world body as a "collection of anti-Semites and third world dictators." The UN, Israel insists, is hopelessly biased and incapable of playing any fair role. Israel's supporters then turn to what is, in fact, the "hopelessly biased" U.S. Congress pressing it to pass one-sided anti-Palestinian or anti-UN legislation. And they do so with no sense of irony.

To be sure, there are some sane voices being heard in Israel, above the din created by the hysterical overreaction. Like the prophets of old, they are calling on the Israeli people to reject the dangerous fallacy behind the Prime Minister's argument. They note that it is not the BDS movement that is blackening Israel's name -- it is the policies of their government that are causing it to become increasing isolated. If anything, they say, the peaceful BDS movement is a response to Palestinian despair and to the world's frustration with the intransigence and acquisitiveness of the Netanyahu government.
In recent weeks, Netanyahu's efforts to demonize the BDS have been joined not only by Congress, but by several state legislatures who are passing anti-BDS bills and now by a collection of pro-Israel billionaires and ultra-right Islamophobic groups who have joined forces to silence the BDS protest movement here in the U.S.. One early tactic they have employed is the creation of an insidious website that posts the bios and pictures of student BDS leaders -- the stated purpose being a warning to prospective employers that these young people are anti-Semites and enemies of Israel.

As a tactic, the resort to BDS is a far better and more productive form of resistance than violence and may be the last best hope of reining in Israel's behavior and salvaging the possibility of creating an independent Palestinian state. It would be a tragedy and a travesty if Israel's bullying tactics were to succeed in silencing the legitimate and moral voices of the BDS movement.

 COMMENT:

So long the bush family the Zionists AND ZIONIST LAWMAKERS and the Israeli supporters are allowed to live in US the huge power ship would undoubtedly sink sooner than latte. Make a note of the comment for future reference that it is the Americans who would be held responsible for allowing the Israelis and its support monkeys to jump on their head to only eat their brain. who is Netanyahu ? He is the Bastard son of NAZI? Any doubt test his DNA and let the World Community of Nations know. Who was Adolf Hitler? He was a Jew but not a bastard like these sons of bitches like NETANYAHU the bastard son of NAZI the ZIONISTS mentioned above.

These terrorists and criminals have grown big under the watch of all the previous presidents and now it has become a real nuisance to the very stability of US with the active support of the Republican Party under the active support of the traitor Bush dynasty once a great friend of the Hail Adolf  Hitler the great and now the Israel Zionist and the mother fucker Zionist lawmakers of US.

The situation rolled down to such a horrible end that the President of US had to threaten Israel of military action against it if it attacks Iran and start war. Netanyahu became emboldened with unimaginable guts to supersede and undo the decision of  the US supreme command. Because of the mother fucker All Zionist Lawmakers in US congress support particularly from Republican Party.  

This now proves both to the saner JEWS and to the World Community of Nation that The great Leader ADOLF HITLER was so right to kick oust these Zionists from GERMANY. But his greatest mistake was that these Most of the Filthy ZIONIST being the cause of Holocaust and kicking oust very cleverly push the SANAR JEWS to the mouth of death while they covertly managed to get out of the country and landed mainly  in US, UK and Palestine and this Hitler could not watch.

This lone Terrorist state of Israel now has become the bone of contention of all major trouble in the world. 

It has become so dangerous that the super powers has to completely isolate it by imposing stringiest sanctions  both economically, and financially  to make it surrender all its nuke armaments, otherwise the very existence of the world would be morbidly at stake.