Jerusalem negotiable, Palestinian right of return not, Likud MK tells J Street - Diplomacy and Defense Israel News | Haaretz

Jerusalem negotiable, Palestinian right of return not, Likud MK tells J Street - Diplomacy and Defense Israel News | Haaretz

Obama urges Netanyahu to speed up peace talks with Palestinians

U.S. president tells PM that for negotiations to yield results, core issues must be seriously discussed; Palestinians claim Israel has not even agreed talks be based on 1967 borders with land swaps.

By Barak Ravid | Oct 1, 2013 | 07:00 AM | 4

Israel will accept a peace agreement that includes handing over Arab parts of Jerusalem, senior Likud lawmaker Tzachi Hanegbi said.

“I think we will be able to give a good answer, a win-win answer, to almost every issue including the Jerusalem issue, including the settlement issue, every issue has a compromise that can be relevant to both sides,” Hanegbi said while speaking as part of a panel of Israeli lawmakers at the J Street national conference.

He said that the question of Palestinian refugees returning to Israel was the one issue that could not be compromised on as part of recently revived peace talks.

“We do know the two-state solution is the only relevant solution, even to those right-wing members of Knesset,” Hanegbi said. “I think they understand the alternative–escalation and bloodshed, or one state–is not an option if you want to keep a Jewish, Zionist state.”

In comments at a news conference following the panel discussion, Hanegbi described how he could convince more conservative members of his party that a two-state solution would be acceptable.

“Look, you’re afraid that Jerusalem will be divided? No, it’s going to be some creative idea that will allow them to have their own sovereignty in their neighborhoods and to declare whatever they want to declare about it, and we will have sovereignty over other parts,” Hanegbi, who is considered a confidant of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, told reporters.

“All these things will be worked out,” Hanegbi concluded. “The devil is, as you know, in the details.”
Hanegbi was joined on the panel by lawmakers from the Yesh Atid, Labor, Hatnuah and Shas parties, which was moderated by Udi Segal, the diplomatic correspondent for Israel’s Channel 2 News.
The diverse representation was perhaps a sign of the transition J Street, which describes itself as “Pro-Israel, Pro-Peace,” from an organization shunned by the Israeli government and standard-bearing American Jewish organizations to one more accepted by the mainstream.
Labor lawmaker Merav Michaeli told reporters that J Street did not fit neatly within Israeli impressions of American Jewry.
“We in Israel aware of two groups of American Jews: Those who run the foundations and are involved with groups like AIPAC, and those who don’t care,” Michaeli said. “But there is apparently a third kind who care but they think differently–and want their voices amplified.”

Also Sunday at the J Street conference, — Israeli opposition leader Shelly Yachimovich reiterated that her Labor Party would provide political cover for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the event he reaches a peace agreement with the Palestinians.

“Those who support a binational state are in fact promoting a bleak scenario that completely contradicts the basis of Zionism,” Yachimovich said. “The two-state solution is the only viable solution for us.”

She called signing a peace deal in our strategic interest, our economic interest and our moral interest,” and said she would not allow the governing Likud Beitnu coalition to collapse over the signing of a peace deal.
 

COMMENT:

The US President’s sincere advice is the only way out of Israeli’s all tensions, Nitanyahu prolonged the solution of the dispute unnecessarily making things more difficult for Israel and to solve the dispute themselves and made it most difficult for the World Community of nations and even UN to solve it. 

Least to mention about US which had to bear the curse of the entire world for protecting Israel that went on intentionally complicating the dispute to linger it every time it set to talk which ended with no useful Progress and every time Israel blaming Palestinian and making making more countries its enemies. This was a disgusting period which US had to gulp and digest in silence the blame as a useless broker .

But to everything in the world there is an imposed limit minimum and maximum by God. And I suppose the issue has reached the maximum time limit of lingering. Analysts all opine Israel better expedite the peace talk to solve the dispute or face the inevitable that would happen in future which none can stop from happening.